Posts Tagged ‘Levy’

London to become most expensive financial hub for bankers

London is to become one of the most expensive global centres for bankers to work in after the forthcoming introduction of a revised income tax banding for high earners, new research has shown.

Click to continue reading

Tougher curbs on banking bonuses under discussion in Europe

European Parliament politicians are in the process of debating tough new restrictions on banking bonuses across the continent.

A new piece of legislation has been proposed by MEP Arlene McCarthy which suggests that bonuses should not be higher than 50 per cent of total annual remuneration.

Half of bonus payouts should be paid in the form of shares which would not be divested for three years under the proposals, reports the Financial Times.

Up to 60 per cent of bonuses could also be deferred for the same length of time if plans are approved by the European Parliament and European Union member states.

The proposals also want to introduce a ban being introduced on the payment of bonuses to directors of financial institutions still receiving government aid.

Last week, a survey of 16 global banks suggested that the UK Treasury is set to receive around $3.75 billion from its one-off 50 per cent levy on bankers’ bonuses.

UK bonus tax set to raise billions

The 50 per cent tax on banking bonuses in the UK may bring in as much as £3 billion ($4.8 billion) in revenue, it has been suggested.

Government sources told the Guardian that there have been higher-than-expected payouts made by large banks operating in the UK, meaning that initial forecasts regarding how much the levy would raise were significantly underestimated.

In December, British chancellor Alistair Darling said that he expected the one-off tax, which applies to bonuses of more than £25,000, was going to raise around £550 million.

The officially revised estimate of how much the tax will bring in will be revealed in the Pre-Election Budget in a few months’ time.

At that point, it will be clear how much each bank operating in the City of London is planning to pay its staff.

Among the firms yet to reveal their remuneration levels are HSBC, Royal Bank of Scotland and Barclays.

Last week, Credit Suisse revealed it was going to cut the bonuses of its UK-based managing directors by 30 per cent, while also instigating a five per cent cut for the rest of its staff around the world to shoulder the burden of the levy.

Obama defends plan to charge banks to recoup TARP funds

In his weekly radio and Internet address, President Barack Obama defended his proposal to subject as many as 50 financial institutions to a levy to recoup the cost of the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Obama also vowed to enact legislation that would rein in practices and strategies that caused the financial crisis.

Click to continue reading

UK regulators will be able to rip up bankers’ contracts

The UK government is set to bring in legislation that will allow the Financial Services Authority to rip up the contracts of bankers deemed to be enjoying excessive pay packets as a reward for risk-taking.

Although the new Financial Services Bill will not apply to current banking contracts and therefore will not affect 2009 bonuses, it is set to come into place from January next year.

The measures are to be outlined on Wednesday in the Queen’s Speech.

In comments reported by the Guardian, City spokesman Lord Myners told Sky News: “What we are saying to the shareholders and boards of directors is: get real, recognize that the previous levels of bonuses are socially unacceptable.”

Other proposals that will be put forward by Gordon Brown’s government include one that will allow British customers to take part in US-style class action suits against financial institutions they feel have treated them badly.

Last week, Mr Brown sent officials to meet with the IMF to lobby for the implementation of a Tobin tax – a levy on transactions carried out between financial institutions.

U.S. criticizes U.K. proposal to tax financial transactions

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner voiced disapproval with a proposal from U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown for a tax on financial transactions. Geithner said he would not support the tax but appeared to soften his stance later, saying the International Monetary Fund would be responsible for coming up with possibilities.

Click to continue reading

Geithner, Brown Split on Tobin Tax at G-20 Meeting

(Bloomberg) — Group of 20 governments split on whether to tax financial trading as part of a broader strategy to ensure the global economy’s expansion is less crisis-prone.

U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown told a meeting of finance chiefs in St. Andrews, Scotland yesterday that such a levy could prevent excessive risk taking and fund future bank rescues, adding momentum to a debate begun by France.

Click to continue reading

This Day in Wall Street History 1862: The tax man cometh

On this day in 1862, the United States Congress gave the green light to the tax-centric “Revenue Act.” The legislation, which was soon signed into law by President Abraham Lincoln, imposed a 3% tax on people with incomes between $600 to $10,000; and also called for a 5% levy on people with incomes reaching over $10,000.

However, the “Revenue Act” was perhaps more notable for creating the Bureau of Internal Revenue, a government agency that was charged with collecting the revenue generated by the new taxes.

Though the “Revenue Act” and its attendant package of taxes were allowed to lapse into legislative oblivion after the Civil War, the Bureau of Internal Revenue eventually came back to haunt America’s taxpaying citizens in 1913, when the 16th Amendment was added to the Constitution.

Along with sanctioning the income tax, the amendment paved the path for the opening of the Internal Revenue Service, which, in its role as the official clearinghouse for the nation’s taxes, proved to be the bureaucratic progeny of the Internal Revenue Service.

Source: History.com

This Day in Wall Street History 1818: Congress ushers in protectionism

On this day in 1818, Congress heeded President James Monroe’s call to uphold the fiscal integrity of domestic industry and gave the green light to sharply protectionist tariff legislation.

Not only did the tariff hike duties on iron imports, but it also put the breaks on an anticipated decrease in the levy charged on textiles.

Click to continue reading

Blog Widget by LinkWithin
Sponsors: