Posts Tagged ‘Finra’

FINRA Seeks Expansion of Brokercheck Tool

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) is currently seeking to expand its Brokercheck tool. Brokercheck gives individuals access to professional information regarding registered brokers and firms. The hope is that investors will use this tool to better get to know the people and companies with whom they are placing their money.

FINRA is seeking to expand this information to include customer complaints reported publicly and to extend the public disclosure period for the full record of a broker who leaves the industry from two to ten years. Also, in a move to go beyond the financial world, FINRA seeks to add to Brokercheck criminal convictions and civil and arbitration judgments involving former brokers.

Richard Ketchum, Chairman and CEO of FINRA, believes that the additional information will help investors, “who are considering whether to conduct, or continue to conduct, business with a particular securities firm or broker. Just as important, they will provide valuable information about persons who have left the securities industry, often not of their own accord, but who can still cause great harm to the investing public.” The new information would include complaint made back from 1999 when electronic filing of broker information began.

FINRA Announces Enforcement Action Relating to Reverse Convertible Notes

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently announced an enforcement action against H&R Block Financial Advisors relating to its sale of reverse convertible notes (RCNs). RCNs usually offer an attractive yield when compared to other stocks and bonds, in part because of their highly risky nature. FINRA charged H&R Block Financial with failing to establish adequate supervisory systems and procedures for overseeing the sales of RCNs to retail investors.

In addition to the enforcement action that fined H&R Block Financial with a $200,000, FINRA also fined and suspended H&R Bock Financial broker Andrew MacGill for making unsuitable sales of RCNs to a retired couple. The couple will receive $75,000 in restitution for their investment loss.

While fining H&R Block for a failure which may well have led to multiple other investors incurring investment losses, FINRA also issued an Investor Alert titled, “Reverse Convertibles – Complex Investment Vehicles.” The goal of this alert is to educate investors on the risk associated with RCNs. Also, FINRA issued Regulatory Notice 10-09 as a reminder to broker/dealers of their obligations to clients when recommending and selling RCNs to their clients.

As stated by FINA Chairman and CEO Richard Ketchum, “Firms selling reverse convertibles [RCNs] or similar products must ensure that their brokers understand the risks and costs associated with these products and perform adequate suitability analyses before recommending them to any customer. Fimrs must also have procedures in place to monitor customer accounts for potentially unsuitable concentration levels of these products.”

The enforcement action announced today by FINRA provides hope for other investors who were not properly advised by their brokers concerning RCNs and who have likewise suffered an investment loss, much like the retired couple referenced in the current action

FINRA Fines Two Financial Firms for Inadequate Anti-Money Laundering Programs

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has fined two financial firms for insufficiencies in their anti-money laundering (AML) programs. Penson Financial Services of Dallas, Texas and Pinnacle Capital Markets of Raleigh, North Carolina were fined $450,000 and $300,000, respectively. These two fines follow a similar action in October 2009 involving deficiencies in the AML program at Scottrade.

Penson Financial Services was fined for failing to operate a functional AML compliance program. The specific failure involved insufficient personal resources allotted to review AML exception reports. In addition to this, FINRA found that penny stock deposits and liquidations were insufficiently reviewed, thus allowing the possibility for fraud and money laundering. Also, written AML procedures were inadequate, and the firm failed to maintain accurate records regarding unsecured deficits in the accounts of its correspondent firms, among other things. Despite enhancements to its AML program in 2007, deficiencies remained endemic to the Penson AML program.

Pinnacle Capital Markets, whose principal business relates to providing online access of U.S. securities markets to foreign customers, including many foreign financial institutions, was fined for deficiencies found regarding detection and reporting of suspicious activity as well as failure to guarantee the identity of account holders. The firm used a manual system of daily reviewing its trade blotter and in doing so failed to detect suspicious trading activity. One such failure involved a pump and dump scheme targeted in a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enforcement action. In a specific failure based on their precise business model, Pinnacle failed to verify the identity of sub-account holders whose accounts were created under the main accounts of foreign financial institutions.

In typical fashion, the firms neither affirmed nor denied the charges against them. To read the official FINRA press release, click here.

FINRA Announces Grant to Establish Legal Clinics for Disadvantaged Investors

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has announced the award of $1 million in grants split among four law schools. Each $250,000 award will go towards launching legal clinics to provide aid to disadvantaged investors involved in securities disputes. Currently, many investors who file small claims find law firms unwilling or unable to represent them. However, even those that do find counsel sometimes hit with prohibitive hourly costs. The four new law clinics will work with such investors to fill this gap in legal services. Pepperdine University School of Law, a Los Angeles area school, is one such recipient of FINRA funds.

The four schools were chosen in part because of their willingness to not only launch this program, but to maintain the clinics past the three year grant period. Further, they have demonstrated a commitment to investor education and outreach in their respective communities. This is the third iteration of FINRA’s clinic grant program, the first recipient being Northwestern University School of Law in 2004 and the second recipient being an established clinic at Pace Law School in 2006.

To view the official press release, please click here.

FINRA Arbitration Cases Boom in 2009

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has reported a significant increase in the amount of cases filed by investors over the past year as compared with years past. For the 2009 calendar year, 7,137 new arbitration cases were filed as opposed to 4,982 filed in 2008; this represents an increase of 43%. Investor claims are not only increasing, but turnaround time for cases has increased as well. The average time for a case that continues through to arbitration was 14 months in 2009 as opposed to 15.7 months in 2008, a 12% decrease in time. Simply put, more cases are going through arbitration and at a faster rate than in the past.

For a complete look at the available statistics, click here.

FINRA Fines Pacific Cornerstone Capital, CEO $750,000

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced today that it has fined Pacific Cornerstone Capital, Inc. of Irvine, CA, and its former chief executive officer, Terry Roussel, a total of $750,000 for failing to include full and complete information in private placement offering documents and marketing material.

Click to continue reading

FINRA – Private Placement Enforcement Cases to Come

James Shorris, executive director of enforcement at the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has been quoted by Investment News as saying that enforcement cases on multiple private placement deals can be expected to begin by next year.

Private placement memorandum (PPM) deals, also known as Reg D offerings, have come under increased scrutiny after enjoying a period of great popularity. Issues that have been brought to the attention of FINRA include:

- Potential misrepresentations made by brokers regarding the sale of PPMs
- Due Diligence issues, including conflicts of interest over the authorship of due diligence reports
- Whether or not the PPM was suitable for many of the clients holding them

These and other issues are currently being examined by FINRA in connection with multiple PPM offerings.

FINRA Arbitrations Filed Seeking Damages of More Than $10 Million — Medical Capital

Aidikoff, Uhl & Bakhtiari (www.securitiesarbitration.com) announces the filing of additional FINRA arbitration claims against brokerage firms that sold Medical Capital and other securities to investors.

To date the firm has filed claims on behalf of more than 25 families seeking more than $10 million in damages against several brokerage firms.

Click to continue reading

UBS Held Liable In Lehman PPN FINRA Arbitration

According to the WSJ today:

In what will likely be a closely studied ruling, a retail investor was awarded $200,000 after a Financial Industry Regulation Authority arbitration panel decided the investor’s UBS AG (UBS) broker inappropriately sold her risky Lehman Brothers principal protected notes.

Click to continue reading

New margin requirements for leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs)

Effective December 1, 2009, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has raised the initial and maintenance margin requirements for leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and associated uncovered options.

Click to continue reading

Blog Widget by LinkWithin
Sponsors: